F1 Hotel Manila, Taguig, Philippines
4-star hotel with 3 outdoor pools, near Fort Bonifacio
- Free buffet breakfast, free WiFi, and free parking
Good
Location
Great location
Breakfast
Tasty breakfast
Cleanliness
Could use a good cleaning
Amenities
Amenities are not the best
F1 Hotel Manila, Taguig, Philippines
from A$155- from A$155
- Deluxe King Room
- Fort Suite
- City Suite, 2 Double Beds
- Studio Room (residential level)
- One bedroom suite (residential level)
- Deluxe Double Room
About F1 Hotel Manila, Taguig, Philippines
Recent reviews
Good 7.4 From 250 reviews
F1 Hotel Manila, Taguig, Philippines
Exceptional
top 1 or 2 hotels !!
maybe the nicest hotel I have stayed in while in the PH.
F1 Hotel Manila, Taguig, Philippines
Very Good
Very reasonable
It was an okay hotel. The building do seem a little older than most of the hotel I've stayed in. I did find it weird that the entrance to the hotel is behind the building with smaller businesses out front. I guess that's okay. The room that I was given had a great view of just 1 building. The fabric covered seat at the restaurant do need a lot of cleaning or replacement. The employees are very polite and helpful.
F1 Hotel Manila, Taguig, Philippines
Exceptional
Great location and really nice rooms
We always stay at F1 Hotel when we're in Manila. Very nice location, rooms are nice, and the breakfast is awesome!
F1 Hotel Manila, Taguig, Philippines
Very Good
Good hotel -- great location and staff.
Our stay at the hotel was impacted by our getting sick the first day with some type of intestinal bug we picked up at a local restaurant. The staff at the hotel was very helpful - especially Joshua and Charliene who cleaned our room. They helped us with extra supplies and accommodating our needs as this bug lasted all week. the only downside at the hotel was the elevators which seemed to be needing service - to the point that they vary rarely all worked.
F1 Hotel Manila, Taguig, Philippines
Poor
Service way too slow. When we checked out, we were accused we smoked in the room which we did not
Is the description of this property not correct? Tell us
